Fulfil the Promise: The Case for Restoring Statehood to J&K

Question (10 marks, ~150 words):

"Once an elected government is in place, continuing Union Territory status is hard to justify." In the context of the demand to restore Statehood to Jammu and Kashmir, examine the issue in light of India's federal principles.

Introduction:

• More than two and a half years after the Centre assured the Supreme Court that Statehood would be restored to J&K, it remains a Union Territory with an elected government but a powerful Lieutenant Governor — reviving a core federalism question.

The case for restoration:

• Subordinating an elected government to an unelected LG lacks principled justification once elections are held.
• Empowered local governance channels grievances into institutions and reduces alienation in a sensitive border region.
• A promise to the Court, Parliament and the people carries a duty to act within a reasonable time.

The counter-view:

• The government cites security; some argue durable stability should precede a full transfer of powers — valid only if it does not become an indefinite deferral.

Way forward:

• Announce a time-bound, phased restoration, transferring subjects progressively with a clear calendar.
• Strengthen elected institutions while retaining necessary security safeguards.

Conclusion:

• Restoring Statehood completes the democratic process elections began; it should not be held hostage to political convenience.